adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel stripes placed on the side of sports shoes
![Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-poWHF5VTZ-E/VED5V9yH9jI/AAAAAAAAGiA/nuwutYdu6b0/s300/QuirijnMeijnen-HR.jpg)
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
![Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jPUlNdXQTnc/VWWjpBlo2aI/AAAAAAAAGrE/cw5do23Mw6I/s1600/Naamloos4.png)
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
![Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lknkBVMsV_E/VWWjk8WdwWI/AAAAAAAAGq8/7hKNer5P8vY/s1600/Naamloos3.png)
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh
6/19/2019 CURIA - Documents curia.europa.eu /juris/document/document_print.jsf?docid=215208&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&
Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv
![K-Swiss Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) Case T 3/15 K-Swiss Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) Case T 3/15](https://www.pbip.com/images/k-swiss.jpg)
K-Swiss Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) Case T 3/15
![The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed](https://script-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/mancinella_fig3.png)